Skip to main content
Book A Free Consult

Home » What's New » The role of non-peer-reviewed research (and forums like Keranet)

The role of non-peer-reviewed research (and forums like Keranet)

I’m not sure what the point of your original question was. You seem to be implying that if one of us shares his or her vast experience accumulated over decades of careful observations, until it’s published it isn’t in some sense “real” (or believable)

We are all very busy and unfortunately have to earn livings as well as contribute to the advancement of science in our field. I’m sure if Bill Gates decided to give any of us a stipend of $1mil/yr under the stipulation that we would drop all our other obligations and focus only on advancing the science, our careers and practice patterns would take a dramatically different trajectory!

There are many levels of “research” and to try to draw any line in the sand between “real” and “not real” is both impossible and pointless

For example, one possible “hierarchy” of research “quality” might look as follows

NEI funded multi-center controlled trial

Drug company funded research for FDA trial

Device company funded research for FDA

Meta analyses

Multicenter trial, top peer-reviewed journal

Multicenter trial, ok peer-reviewed journal

Singlecenter trial, top PR journal

Singlecenter trial, ok PR journal


Poster at AAO ASCRS or ESCRS

Publication in non-peer-reviewed journal

Large nonpublished observations (k-net?)

Drug company dinner talk

Published case report

Pearls an older doctor gives in the hallway

Observations from small sample sizes

As you can see, any line you draw in this hierarchy is necessarily arbitrary. Worse, you’d be ignoring important sources of “real life” validation and information (ie the items towards the bottom of this list)

Once something is published it doesn’t become “real”. It just becomes “more public”

If you perform research under IRB it isn’t automatically “safer and more ethical”. You’ve merely formalized the ethical review process that I’m sure we all engage in carefully ourselves, weighing the (acceptably low) risks to our specific patients against the (higher) chance of finding a substantial benefit for all our future patients (and those of other surgeons, if shared properly on forums like Keranet)

One of the main reasons I’ve rejoined Keranet as an active participant, after a hiatus of nearly a decade, is I’m planning on retiring soon, and have realized that my plan to publish many things I’ve learned about ASA in peer-reviewed journals isn’t going to happen. Fellows graduate and don’t have the time to turn posters into papers. We get older, have family obligations, and our careers, like our lives, pass by so quickly

The giants in our field seem to be able to “do it all.” But we don’t ever see the full burden of their sacrifice.

No other laser vision correction surgeon in New York….

No other laser vision correction surgeon in New York....

...offers you the opportunity to have a Free Remote Consultation with the surgeon! Ask Dr. Chynn your main question or concern, and will answer, personally, within 2 business days!

Unsure whether you're a good candidate because of a lot of astigmatism? Large pupils? Dry eyes? Maybe you were rejected by LASIK surgeons due to a “thin cornea” or high prescription.

Take advantage of this incredible opportunity to find out if LASEK is an option for you from Dr. Chynn, our famous, cornea fellowship-trained, Columbia & Harvard graduate who’s in MENSA & was the 1st eye surgeon in NY, NJ, CT & PA to get LASIK, & has performed 1,000 PRKs, 5,000 LASIKs, 10,000 LASEKs, and 5,000 epiLASEKs

But please be considerate. Dr. Chynn gets paid $1,000/hour as a consultant for expert networks & expert witness, so please limit yourself to your most pressing question or concern, as he’s doing this for free on a trial basis to help interested patients.

Please include the information below in your email so Dr. Chynn can answer your question specifically.

Approximate prescription (if known):
Occupation (the more specific the better):
Main barrier or concern:

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Ask Dr. Chynn

interstitial v1